Session S67b (Wednesday, 2pm, CHEM 102)

P836: Researchers' perceptions of self-assembly: Reactions to published definitions of “self-assembly”

Thomas Bussey (University of Nevada – Las Vegas, USA), Kent Crippen (University of Florida, USA), Wendy Ho, Cindy Kern, Megan Litster, MaryKay Orgill, Sarah Wood (University of Nevada – Las Vegas, USA)

There are a variety of accepted definitions of self-assembly in the literature (e.g., Pelesko, 2007; Whitesides, 2002). Some definitions are fairly vague while others are more specific, providing exhaustive lists of necessary, and sometimes conflicting, characteristics of self-assembly. We asked self-assembly researchers (N=323) to respond to five published definitions of self-assembly. Analysis of researchers’ responses revealed a lack of consensus within the field as to what defines self-assembly. In this presentation, we will discuss the variety of characteristics used by researchers to align themselves with or dispute the published definitions of self-assembly.


A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.